Vija Celmins is (Wikipedia) “a Latvian–American visual artist best known for photo-realistic paintings and drawings of natural environments and phenomena such as the ocean, spider webs, star fields, and rocks”.
Born 1938, she fled from Soviet occupation of Latvia with her parents in 1940 to Germany where she lived in a refugee camp until 1948, then was relocated to the USA (aged 10). Speaking no English, she focused on – and was encouraged by her teachers in – drawing, painting and other creative pursuits. In 1955, aged 17, she went to art school in Indianapolis, graduating in 1962, then on to UCLA, obtaining her Masters in 1965. Thereafter she has lived in Venice and finally New York, pursuing her practice and teaching.
Celmins’ repertory includes drawing (mainly in pencil), painting, sculpture and, latterly, woodcuts and charcoal. Since the 1960s, she has focused on work that balances abstract with photorealism, often with no reference point (no horizon, depth of field, edge nor landmarks), thus stripping them of context. Recent work includes prints and mezzotints of her trademark subjects such as night skies and ocean waves. Her work has been extensively shown internationally and commands pries in excess of $1m.
I started my exploration of Celmins’ work by watching, several times, the course-recommended video “Vija Celmins / Desert, Sea and Stars”. I was unimpressed; I immediately suspected phoneyism: “I don’t really call it drawing….I was using a pencil and paper as my medium”. ?!!! She then goes on to talk about meticulously painting found objects, saying her work is “redescribing what I see”. I tried to maintain an open mind as I heard her say (admit?) “I’m not an idea artist”.
Next, I watched the Tate’s video “Explore the art of Vija Celmins”. This features the artist in her sparse, tidy, clinical studio, working from a photograph of the night-sky, picking out individual stars as tiny spots on a copper plate – a task she has been working at for three years, so far. She is clearly process obsessed – indeed, toward the end of the video she concedes that the pitted plate itself as much a work of art as the image itself. To me, her painstaking dedication and repetition, border on pointlessness. Why is she wasting her life away like this? Is it a product of – perhaps even an excuse for – lack of ideas? Is it driven – ironically – by the stellar prices her work will realise?
Anyone who risks calling themselves a creative artist also puts their head high above the parapet. I dislike the thought of being the one to ”shoot” that head off, lest one day someone should take pot shots at me (would chance be a fine thing?). But I am also aware that, in the scheme of things, my ammunition will have little effect. Vija Celmins’s art will continue to sell for extreme sums (regardless of those opinions of ”philistines”such as my humble self). At the end of the day, who am I to argue with that fact? But at the same time, I feel a little sorry that this artist appears not to have reached her full creative potential – self-actualisation, in my view – being more than just pounds, shillings and pence.
I have been listening to ‘My Life as a Work of Art’ by Katya Tylevich and Ben Eastham read to me by my friendly elf in an attempt to understand better the world of contemporary art. So far we are on the subject of Martin Creed’s work.
Watch this space.
References:
http://www.vimeo.com/22299024
Tate. Vija Celmins. ”Painting takes just a second to go in”. https://youtu.be/SsbkzSrCdlg